Source: A quote by the mother, “always do what you know to be best even if it is the most difficult thing to do.”
It is not easy to always do the right thing. It comes with tension, pressure and fear. This set of emotions can make it hard for a person to listen to reason, and act in for the right. Trusting our reason and not our fear will always take us in the right direction. When we perceive an act that seems ethically wrong, it is our civic duty to put an end to it.
Doing the right thing and doing the easy thing are not always the same. Turning a blind eye to bribery could be as bad as accepting it yourself. Though it might be easier to let go of it, it is wrong. At the airport I once observed a man pay the policeman at customs a bunch of thousand rupee notes and walking out without a check. Being 17 I couldn’t do much then, but after witnessing 26/11 I cant help but wonder how wrong I was. Those could have been bags with artillery. The police turned a blind eye to the fisher-people who came to inform them about the boatloads of mysterious men to colaba. Fighting off reason, laziness caused 26/11 a disaster that could have been avoided or at least kept under control.
Sometimes the right thing might be giving up something that means most to you but one must look at the reason behind every action and not the emotional pleasure. Some believe that the reason is that actions bring emotional pleasure but those acts do not bring abut positive results in the long run. After the Indians saw what British rule in India was doing to its economy, there was a need to revolt. The easier way out would have been to ignore the fact that matters were going from bad to worse and that the generations to come would probably be slaves, and to enjoy the freedoms the people had at that time. If that had been done, then India nor the world would be the way it was today. Revolutionaries like Mangal Pandey saw the need to fix this mess, and gave up the most precious thing to any person, their lives. They did the right thing to make our lives simpler. It mustn’t have been easy, but it is because of the sacrifice of people like that, that today an Indian can be the boss of a British man in a company.
What the mother is propagating through this quote is something that everyone should follow. Only if we strive to do the right thing, will the world be a better place. Good things never come easy and that is why they come with a sense of pride. Even the small things do matter. We must always remain unaffected by the fear that comes with fighting evil and wrong. As the mother also said, “it is only when we are not disturbed that we can always do the right thing at the right time in the right way.”
Showing posts with label knowledge at work.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knowledge at work.. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Monday, July 20, 2009
forever young.
“Hoping for the best but expecting the worst.” –youth group in the song forever young.
The line that appealed most to me was, “hoping for the best but expecting the worst.” It has been like my motto ever since I first heard this song. Whenever in anticipation of something to come, I always keep this in mind. It is like a consolation and warning to prevent the flow of too much emotion. It is a logical way of maintaining a mind set that will prepare a person to face the bad times, without making them too much of pessimists. Believing in what this line is trying to teach us makes us realists. There is a need for reason to keep a check on emotion and by ‘hoping for the best but expecting the worst, we make ourselves do just that.
I perceive life to be a mixture of good and bad things. I believe that every event has at least two possible outcomes, one good and one bad. A person must always live hoping and keeping faith that the best outcome will prevail. Yet the person must not sit back waiting for good things to come to them. They must prepare for the worst, make an effort to get the best and only then it will come to them. Though I am a firm believer that one must strive to get what one wants, there are things out of our control and in those cases this line should be one’s only rule.
26/11 is considered to be one of the most tragic events of contemporary Indian history. Information of unlicensed boats docking at Cuffe parade was given to the police. Threats had been made in past as well. The police should have heightened security and stayed prepared hoping that guns wouldn’t need to be fired. Instead, sitting back expecting the best, few terrorists were able to take hotels, a building and a hospital hostage for 3 days. If man prepared for the worst then history would be written differently. Scientifically, weather can be foretold tornadoes and storms can not be prevented, but instead of just giving warnings, preparations must be made to prevent extensive damage. This way the casualties and the destruction could be kept to a minimum.
Expecting the worst isn’t being negative but being realistic. One might argue that it pulls the emotions down, but taking the few cases when the preparations came to no use and the best outcome prevailed would be confirmation bias. Its always better to be safe than sorry as people say.
The line that appealed most to me was, “hoping for the best but expecting the worst.” It has been like my motto ever since I first heard this song. Whenever in anticipation of something to come, I always keep this in mind. It is like a consolation and warning to prevent the flow of too much emotion. It is a logical way of maintaining a mind set that will prepare a person to face the bad times, without making them too much of pessimists. Believing in what this line is trying to teach us makes us realists. There is a need for reason to keep a check on emotion and by ‘hoping for the best but expecting the worst, we make ourselves do just that.
I perceive life to be a mixture of good and bad things. I believe that every event has at least two possible outcomes, one good and one bad. A person must always live hoping and keeping faith that the best outcome will prevail. Yet the person must not sit back waiting for good things to come to them. They must prepare for the worst, make an effort to get the best and only then it will come to them. Though I am a firm believer that one must strive to get what one wants, there are things out of our control and in those cases this line should be one’s only rule.
26/11 is considered to be one of the most tragic events of contemporary Indian history. Information of unlicensed boats docking at Cuffe parade was given to the police. Threats had been made in past as well. The police should have heightened security and stayed prepared hoping that guns wouldn’t need to be fired. Instead, sitting back expecting the best, few terrorists were able to take hotels, a building and a hospital hostage for 3 days. If man prepared for the worst then history would be written differently. Scientifically, weather can be foretold tornadoes and storms can not be prevented, but instead of just giving warnings, preparations must be made to prevent extensive damage. This way the casualties and the destruction could be kept to a minimum.
Expecting the worst isn’t being negative but being realistic. One might argue that it pulls the emotions down, but taking the few cases when the preparations came to no use and the best outcome prevailed would be confirmation bias. Its always better to be safe than sorry as people say.
Michael Jackson.
Source: amul butter ad on Michael Jackson.
The ad reads black or white, all are fans, followed by Amul butter, you just can’t beat it. Black or white is one of Michael’s songs, which is anti racism. Beat it is another song by him where he sings about overcoming any obstacle that comes in your way. The motive being to always “beat it”. The ad on the Amul billboard is a response to the death of this great legend, but what the ad means is different from what the songs originally were meant to mean. The black and white reference was to show that all races love the butter and the beat it reference was to show that Amul is the best nothing can “beat it”. Yet there is a second meaning, which is that Blacks and whites were all fans of Jackson, but no one can beat or cheat death.
This billboard shows how everything is open to our perception’s interpretation. While I asked my mother her view on the board she said that it was a tribute to him and they used random lyrics to promote the selling of Amul, yet I believe the additional reason was praising Jackson and paying respects to him. Some might even say the you cant beat it was mocking his lyrics because he preached beat it, but he himself couldn’t beat death. The idea behind this board is to entertain the masses and to promote Amul so that more people purchase it. All ads are designed to attract the eye of the observer and tempt him into buying the certain product. Most ads are false. The shampoos that promise no hair fall, and the creams that promise the disappearance of all acne. Ads are all meant to please the eye and gain revenue for the company responsible for the ad.
Companies attempt to hit the emotion of the viewers. They use many techniques by making their ads sentimental and touching, some use celebrities to promote their product, some use comedy, and some use cartoons. The motive is to win emotion in such a manner that logic and reason play a backseat in the choosing of what products to buy. People spend thousands of rupees on belts that promise to build abs, but none of that ever truly happens. It is just the way to sell a product.
The language used in the ads is very important. They must be to the point. The body language, the acting, the punch line all must be designed to captivate the audience. It shouldn’t be too long, yet never too short. The Amul ad hits the emotions of all his fans, and manages to make them smile and miss him, yet reminding them that maul is entertaining and probably a good butter. Amul ads have always been funny and they actually have managed to make me enjoy reading them and eating the butter that cant be “beat”.
The ad reads black or white, all are fans, followed by Amul butter, you just can’t beat it. Black or white is one of Michael’s songs, which is anti racism. Beat it is another song by him where he sings about overcoming any obstacle that comes in your way. The motive being to always “beat it”. The ad on the Amul billboard is a response to the death of this great legend, but what the ad means is different from what the songs originally were meant to mean. The black and white reference was to show that all races love the butter and the beat it reference was to show that Amul is the best nothing can “beat it”. Yet there is a second meaning, which is that Blacks and whites were all fans of Jackson, but no one can beat or cheat death.
This billboard shows how everything is open to our perception’s interpretation. While I asked my mother her view on the board she said that it was a tribute to him and they used random lyrics to promote the selling of Amul, yet I believe the additional reason was praising Jackson and paying respects to him. Some might even say the you cant beat it was mocking his lyrics because he preached beat it, but he himself couldn’t beat death. The idea behind this board is to entertain the masses and to promote Amul so that more people purchase it. All ads are designed to attract the eye of the observer and tempt him into buying the certain product. Most ads are false. The shampoos that promise no hair fall, and the creams that promise the disappearance of all acne. Ads are all meant to please the eye and gain revenue for the company responsible for the ad.
Companies attempt to hit the emotion of the viewers. They use many techniques by making their ads sentimental and touching, some use celebrities to promote their product, some use comedy, and some use cartoons. The motive is to win emotion in such a manner that logic and reason play a backseat in the choosing of what products to buy. People spend thousands of rupees on belts that promise to build abs, but none of that ever truly happens. It is just the way to sell a product.
The language used in the ads is very important. They must be to the point. The body language, the acting, the punch line all must be designed to captivate the audience. It shouldn’t be too long, yet never too short. The Amul ad hits the emotions of all his fans, and manages to make them smile and miss him, yet reminding them that maul is entertaining and probably a good butter. Amul ads have always been funny and they actually have managed to make me enjoy reading them and eating the butter that cant be “beat”.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Knowledge at work- i dream to dream.
youtube.com britains got talent- Susan Boyle sings i dream to dream.
Probably one of the most judgment shattering videos ever seen, the 47 year old unemployed woman tried her luck at the show Britain's got Talent. On walking in, she was the cause for a sequential laughter amongst the audience. Not a very appealing face, and quite awkward in mannerisms, everyone perceived her to be one of those talentless fools, coming to try their luck to gain humorous attention. Everyone in the audience and the judges themselves didn't take her seriously. Claiming she wanted to be like Elane Page, everybody had a sort of gut feeling that she wouldn't be able to sing a straight note. Even the much cynical Simon spoke to her with an undertone of mockery.
But then, she began to sing "I dream to dream" and with less than 5 seconds, the laughing crowd converted to an audience full of fans, giving her a standing ovation. She managed to prove every single person wrong. She went back home with all three yeses, her head held high, and praises from one as rude and egoistical as Simon Cowell.
The video was a shock to me. her voice a shock all around the globe. Most people have the habit of judging another instantaneously. A label is stuck to their foreheads, and they are branded. people have their "gut feelings" about a person which in reality comes out of physical appearances. they perceive a person without reason, or justifications, and most of the time, the labeled person has no real way out of it no matter what they try doing. We see this so often in our everyday lives. A girl is labeled as a loose person. Even if the stories people have heard are simple rumors, or she is dressed to party for an occasion unknown to the onlooker, she gets this label, and people start talking. By the end of a couple of days, her name is associated with being loose, and she is branded for good. Even if the girl tries to change to improve her reputation, no body really gives her a chance. History shows us times where women weren't taken seriously. Where they were inferior, and no matter what they said, they were taken lightly. It is hard to prove a large group of people wrong when you stand alone, because no body likes being proved wrong.
Susan manages this in less that a minute over a hundred people who laughed at her, were now standing up and cheering her on. the so called "gut feelings" were all proved to be wrong, and she stood there, singing as though it was her last laugh. How often do we label people based on appearances? i myself thought it she was crazy wen i first saw the starting, but after being proved wrong i see how so often i might have been proved wrong, but never gave the labeled party that chance. How would i feel if the tables turned, and it was me against the world? its not right to assume before proving, and as a knower, i now know how terribly wrong it is. We all do it, we do it to our peers, to randoms on the road, to our teachers, and to mere acquaintances; and it is wrong. Susan Boyle managed, but often others don't, and so we must think twice, think a million times before sticking a label on a person who might not deserve it. Can we really reason out before letting ourselves make such risky assumptions?? what happens when the assumptions made, and out "gut-feelings" are on matters of more importance? can we always leave it to chance, and wait to see if by that tiny possibility, we are proved wrong? Susan Boyle is a reminder to all of us around the world, that a book must never be judged by its cover!
Probably one of the most judgment shattering videos ever seen, the 47 year old unemployed woman tried her luck at the show Britain's got Talent. On walking in, she was the cause for a sequential laughter amongst the audience. Not a very appealing face, and quite awkward in mannerisms, everyone perceived her to be one of those talentless fools, coming to try their luck to gain humorous attention. Everyone in the audience and the judges themselves didn't take her seriously. Claiming she wanted to be like Elane Page, everybody had a sort of gut feeling that she wouldn't be able to sing a straight note. Even the much cynical Simon spoke to her with an undertone of mockery.
But then, she began to sing "I dream to dream" and with less than 5 seconds, the laughing crowd converted to an audience full of fans, giving her a standing ovation. She managed to prove every single person wrong. She went back home with all three yeses, her head held high, and praises from one as rude and egoistical as Simon Cowell.
The video was a shock to me. her voice a shock all around the globe. Most people have the habit of judging another instantaneously. A label is stuck to their foreheads, and they are branded. people have their "gut feelings" about a person which in reality comes out of physical appearances. they perceive a person without reason, or justifications, and most of the time, the labeled person has no real way out of it no matter what they try doing. We see this so often in our everyday lives. A girl is labeled as a loose person. Even if the stories people have heard are simple rumors, or she is dressed to party for an occasion unknown to the onlooker, she gets this label, and people start talking. By the end of a couple of days, her name is associated with being loose, and she is branded for good. Even if the girl tries to change to improve her reputation, no body really gives her a chance. History shows us times where women weren't taken seriously. Where they were inferior, and no matter what they said, they were taken lightly. It is hard to prove a large group of people wrong when you stand alone, because no body likes being proved wrong.
Susan manages this in less that a minute over a hundred people who laughed at her, were now standing up and cheering her on. the so called "gut feelings" were all proved to be wrong, and she stood there, singing as though it was her last laugh. How often do we label people based on appearances? i myself thought it she was crazy wen i first saw the starting, but after being proved wrong i see how so often i might have been proved wrong, but never gave the labeled party that chance. How would i feel if the tables turned, and it was me against the world? its not right to assume before proving, and as a knower, i now know how terribly wrong it is. We all do it, we do it to our peers, to randoms on the road, to our teachers, and to mere acquaintances; and it is wrong. Susan Boyle managed, but often others don't, and so we must think twice, think a million times before sticking a label on a person who might not deserve it. Can we really reason out before letting ourselves make such risky assumptions?? what happens when the assumptions made, and out "gut-feelings" are on matters of more importance? can we always leave it to chance, and wait to see if by that tiny possibility, we are proved wrong? Susan Boyle is a reminder to all of us around the world, that a book must never be judged by its cover!
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Equilibrium April 18th.
The third world war came to an end, and with it, came the mark of a new era. The era of Libria, where the survivors head bent on preventing any further aggression, decide to eradicate the disease that plagued all existence, and caused such destruction. With symptoms such as hate, anger rage, and finally the thirst for war, the apocalyptic terror, EMOTION. An era where no form of emotion could be expressed, no marriages, no sex, no art, no pictures, no ornaments were permitted. There were people who were meant to enforce these laws, clerics and council members with an arms all instructed to shoot any person who was guilty of “sense offending”. If needed to be question, they were locked into a room until the questions were complete, and then they were incinerated.
The worst part of the holocaust was that everyday, man was drugged at specific times with an emotion-numbing drug, which ceased man’s ability to feel or sense. This the time during which the movie “equilibrium” is shot. It is a story based on a cleric John Preston missed one of the drug doses he is meant to take, and instead of going to the place “equilibrium” to get a refill of that dose, he just skips it. Due to this, he starts t feel. After 4 years, he feels the loss of his wife, and pain in shooting a dog for existing. Finally he feels bad for killing his own partner for feeling. A partner who told him that dying was something he would gladly do instead of losing out on emotion. The girl he falls in love with it burnt in front of his eyes, and he can not stop it. She tells him that he lives in a world where the strife for the future means giving the future the position to strive for the generations to come.
One of the most controversial lines in the movie is by the vice council of the “father”( the man in charge), who says, “ without restraint, without control, emotion is chaos.” How true is that statement? Is man really incompetent and unable to control his emotions, or can emotion be controlled?
After watching the movie, one cant help but think about the first and second world wars. Were they really a direct result of emotion, and the truth is, they were. Starting from the German ego, to British imperialism, then going on to the second world war which began with the French anger lay out in the Treaty of Versailles, to Hitler’s rage against the Jews, it all indeed was triggered by emotion. Recently there was a rape in north Bombay where a Group of college boys, took advantage of a drunken friend, out of lust and frustration. Emotions out of control leads to destruction of so many lives, so is it really needed? Is it really a disease?
But then again, a life with no emotion, where today and tomorrow are no different. where life is all about preventing future problems, ignoring the lack of joy in life. Yea there is a down side to emotion, but should man realy sacrifice his happiness for the sake of the ruin caused by sadness? Even it that were true is there really any way to subdue emotion?
Today we all need reason to live. It is the thirst to find joy, to find love, to be content. Even when tings are hard, people have motivation to live, even after a woman is raped, she still wants to survive, because the feeling of happiness is so precious and so worth every minute of the pain. Today people take drugs to mimic that ease, but its still not good enough. That pristine state of happiness is so pure, that one moment of clarity is worth all the moments of sadness. We see stories of people surviving long distance relationships, running away from home to be one with the people who bring them happiness, we see the poor still fight to survive when they know that at the end of the day they must return to a slum. Why what motivates them? Well its simple, the hope that someday they will be happy. In equilibrium, the motive was so futuristic, that the people of the present lived a life only serving future generations, whom they knew would be bound to the same terrible fate.
Where is the line drawn between reason and emotion? Is there a possibility to balance them out? Can it ever be found? I don’t know yet, but I do know one thing for certain, life will cease to exist without emotion!
The worst part of the holocaust was that everyday, man was drugged at specific times with an emotion-numbing drug, which ceased man’s ability to feel or sense. This the time during which the movie “equilibrium” is shot. It is a story based on a cleric John Preston missed one of the drug doses he is meant to take, and instead of going to the place “equilibrium” to get a refill of that dose, he just skips it. Due to this, he starts t feel. After 4 years, he feels the loss of his wife, and pain in shooting a dog for existing. Finally he feels bad for killing his own partner for feeling. A partner who told him that dying was something he would gladly do instead of losing out on emotion. The girl he falls in love with it burnt in front of his eyes, and he can not stop it. She tells him that he lives in a world where the strife for the future means giving the future the position to strive for the generations to come.
One of the most controversial lines in the movie is by the vice council of the “father”( the man in charge), who says, “ without restraint, without control, emotion is chaos.” How true is that statement? Is man really incompetent and unable to control his emotions, or can emotion be controlled?
After watching the movie, one cant help but think about the first and second world wars. Were they really a direct result of emotion, and the truth is, they were. Starting from the German ego, to British imperialism, then going on to the second world war which began with the French anger lay out in the Treaty of Versailles, to Hitler’s rage against the Jews, it all indeed was triggered by emotion. Recently there was a rape in north Bombay where a Group of college boys, took advantage of a drunken friend, out of lust and frustration. Emotions out of control leads to destruction of so many lives, so is it really needed? Is it really a disease?
But then again, a life with no emotion, where today and tomorrow are no different. where life is all about preventing future problems, ignoring the lack of joy in life. Yea there is a down side to emotion, but should man realy sacrifice his happiness for the sake of the ruin caused by sadness? Even it that were true is there really any way to subdue emotion?
Today we all need reason to live. It is the thirst to find joy, to find love, to be content. Even when tings are hard, people have motivation to live, even after a woman is raped, she still wants to survive, because the feeling of happiness is so precious and so worth every minute of the pain. Today people take drugs to mimic that ease, but its still not good enough. That pristine state of happiness is so pure, that one moment of clarity is worth all the moments of sadness. We see stories of people surviving long distance relationships, running away from home to be one with the people who bring them happiness, we see the poor still fight to survive when they know that at the end of the day they must return to a slum. Why what motivates them? Well its simple, the hope that someday they will be happy. In equilibrium, the motive was so futuristic, that the people of the present lived a life only serving future generations, whom they knew would be bound to the same terrible fate.
Where is the line drawn between reason and emotion? Is there a possibility to balance them out? Can it ever be found? I don’t know yet, but I do know one thing for certain, life will cease to exist without emotion!
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
emotion and reason April 8th
media source: video on emotion and reason (one showed to us in class.)
Is it our emotion, or reason that drives us? According to the video i saw in TOK class, one should not be the driven by emotion as it leads to unfortunate circumstances. the video used Hitler as an example of being guided by emotion. those who let Hitler touch their emotions, joined the Nazi party, and created havoc and were guilty of genocide. on the other hand, listening to our ability to reason, made the person act rationally and one did not make a fool of one's self. the conclusion was that one shouldn't be driven by emotions, but one should still look after ones emotional needs.
I disagree with this completely. one mustn't get carried away by their emotions, but keeping them on the back seat is incorrect. Life is too short to live in fear. Life is too short to live by the rules. our emotional hunger must be fulfilled for if we don't live a satisfying life, we will die full of regret. before my grandfather went in for surgery, my Grandmother said that if only he hadn't lived a life on the edge, drinking, smoking, eating all sorts of food, gambling and getting so stressed out because of the activities he got himself into, then he wouldn't be there int he first place. in retaliation what my grandfather said really changed how i felt. he said that she was right, he probably wouldn't, but then again she wouldn't be by his side, for she loved him for who he was, and living on the edge was his "thing". he said he wouldn't change his life even on his deathbed, because it was satisfying and at least he was leaving knowing that he had no regrets and did everything he ever wanted to do. That is the kind of life i want to lead. A life where there is no risk, is a life too boring. letting our emotion take a backseat is not being true to ourselves, and is sacrificing our own happiness.
I'm not saying that we mustn't give reason importance, for without reason, fun can go out of control, and then we might regret giving emotion all the power, before we must give reason a fair say. act within the rational limits reason gives us. reason must cooperate with emotion and draw a line that mustn't under any circumstances be crossed, for example doing drugs would cross the line for a teenager. Using Hitler as an example in a way was hitting our emotion. The directors tried making us anti emotion power by telling us that Hitler used that method to brainwash the Germans. But we should not tel ourselves be affected by that for our emotional satisfaction is what we all live for. giving it a back seat is like punishing ourselves for living and dreaming.
The claim i feel is wrong and misguided. it is not rational and people shouldn't follow it. for if the claim were right, then most people would be living a life that they shouldn't lead, and all lives would come to a stand still. we should worry about the possibility for it being true, because do we really want to live a life in chains? should we surrender to emotion and remain bound for life?
Is it our emotion, or reason that drives us? According to the video i saw in TOK class, one should not be the driven by emotion as it leads to unfortunate circumstances. the video used Hitler as an example of being guided by emotion. those who let Hitler touch their emotions, joined the Nazi party, and created havoc and were guilty of genocide. on the other hand, listening to our ability to reason, made the person act rationally and one did not make a fool of one's self. the conclusion was that one shouldn't be driven by emotions, but one should still look after ones emotional needs.
I disagree with this completely. one mustn't get carried away by their emotions, but keeping them on the back seat is incorrect. Life is too short to live in fear. Life is too short to live by the rules. our emotional hunger must be fulfilled for if we don't live a satisfying life, we will die full of regret. before my grandfather went in for surgery, my Grandmother said that if only he hadn't lived a life on the edge, drinking, smoking, eating all sorts of food, gambling and getting so stressed out because of the activities he got himself into, then he wouldn't be there int he first place. in retaliation what my grandfather said really changed how i felt. he said that she was right, he probably wouldn't, but then again she wouldn't be by his side, for she loved him for who he was, and living on the edge was his "thing". he said he wouldn't change his life even on his deathbed, because it was satisfying and at least he was leaving knowing that he had no regrets and did everything he ever wanted to do. That is the kind of life i want to lead. A life where there is no risk, is a life too boring. letting our emotion take a backseat is not being true to ourselves, and is sacrificing our own happiness.
I'm not saying that we mustn't give reason importance, for without reason, fun can go out of control, and then we might regret giving emotion all the power, before we must give reason a fair say. act within the rational limits reason gives us. reason must cooperate with emotion and draw a line that mustn't under any circumstances be crossed, for example doing drugs would cross the line for a teenager. Using Hitler as an example in a way was hitting our emotion. The directors tried making us anti emotion power by telling us that Hitler used that method to brainwash the Germans. But we should not tel ourselves be affected by that for our emotional satisfaction is what we all live for. giving it a back seat is like punishing ourselves for living and dreaming.
The claim i feel is wrong and misguided. it is not rational and people shouldn't follow it. for if the claim were right, then most people would be living a life that they shouldn't lead, and all lives would come to a stand still. we should worry about the possibility for it being true, because do we really want to live a life in chains? should we surrender to emotion and remain bound for life?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
